home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20000114-20000217
/
000013_news@columbia.edu _Sun Jan 16 01:55:36 2000.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2020-01-01
|
2KB
Return-Path: <news@columbia.edu>
Received: from newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.30])
by watsun.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA05936
for <kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 01:55:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
by newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA18021
for kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 01:37:24 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu: news set sender to <news> using -f
From: jaltman@watsun.cc.columbia.edu (Jeffrey Altman)
Subject: Re: MS-DOS Kermit, more capabalities
Date: 16 Jan 2000 06:37:22 GMT
Organization: Columbia University
Message-ID: <85rov2$hj2$1@newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu>
To: kermit.misc@columbia.edu
In article <z7ag4.2580$NU6.47237@tw12.nn.bcandid.com>,
<cangel@famvid.com> wrote:
: The 94 byte packet is devastatingly slow at today's modem speeds.
:
: Wouldn't it be a worthwhile priority for this newsgroup and the `team' to stress
: the fact that this is no longer the optimum packet size and get the message
: across to other software authors?
:
: I'm really not equipped to persuade them and it just becomes an argument when
: I try to persuade them.
If you read the archives of this newsgroup for the last 15 years you
will see that we have done our best to try. Not only in this newsgroup
but in the protocol manual "Kermit: A File Transfer Protocol" and the
books "Using MS-DOS Kermit" and "Using C-Kermit" in all editions.
Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer * Kermit-95 for Win32 and OS/2
The Kermit Project * Columbia University
612 West 115th St #716 * New York, NY * 10025
http://www.kermit-project.org/k95.html * kermit-support@kermit-project.org